Empresa de noticias - trending topics en Santiago pide presupuesto para nueva página Web

Petición de presupuesto para proyecto de nueva página Web para empresa de noticias - trending topics, dedicada a noticias, en Santiago, Chile, con un presupuesto de 750 euros, ¡Aprovecha!

Detalles de presupuesto Web solicitado

Ubicación:

Santiago, Chile

Tipo de proyecto:

Desarrollar una nueva página Web

Tipo de página Web:

Otro tipo de Web

Sector comercial:

Noticias - trending topics

Tipo de productos / servicio:

Noticias

Descripción del proyecto:

Sitio web en varios idiomas eng, esp y versiones diferentes por pais.
4 secciones principales con noticias que las suben lo usuarios autorizados y que deben someterse a votación y según lo resultados de la votación se deben modificar en su orden.

Aquí les dejo en detalle lo que se pide desarrollar en ingles:
The project is a site of contents. Content = headline subhead text. We will call them «products» created by users. A friendly –intuitive– and responsive design (mobile and web) look for 1) displayed products and 2) Non-displayed products (like in a home web) are required.

Features of Bloomberg and Wall Street Journal mobile app are good for benchmarking. An intro like the one in the NYT app (for one second) is required. We can use it for ads.

A sequential banner called «Philosophy» like NYTimes below –we can use as ad– is required.
Like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqikYLkF4jU from 0:21.

Country options (US Edition, etc.) 3 link for sites information internal search engine required.

«Subscribe» and «log in» social login with LinkedIn Facebook account and profile for users to be completed is required.

- Basic User. E-mail pass. Able to vote, comment and share Products in Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc. to add contents to the Archive.
- Advanced User. Profile completed in mandatory fields, those Facebook request to open an account. Able to leave WhatsApp voice comments.
- Editor User. Able to create and apply to publish Products. For each Product can be until 3 editors

The users profile will have 2 additional but optional elements: 1) A bar with from 1 to 7 called “Perception”. The
4th is centre EX – X – MX – Centre – MY – Y – EY. The user could choose to show its perception or not. 2)
Nickname. The users could choose to be seen with name or nickname in each interaction.

Each content will belong to a: Product (type of) – Section – Country or City – Topic – Trending Topic (if it is a trending). When you click one of them, the Products related must show up by “Top” “Latest” (by date) as in Twitter. For example, “Las Condes” or “Covid” will show all Products relating to them “Top” “Latest”. The same when you click an Editor User. It will show all its publications. The organization of this categories is required. Use as benchmark: Axios, NYT, WSJ, etc.

Each Product will have Editor User or Author – its Bio – Day Time – Icons to share, follow comment.

Bottom page is required with basics like: About - Advertise - Help Centre - Privacy Notice - Cookie Notice - Terms of Use - Contact Us. The name of the site will be Forum Maximus. A logo is required. A space for our motto – below the name– and space for ads are required. NYT and WSJ are good for benchmark.
Space for ads like ex-ante.cl. Modules to create the Products, back office and visor of metrics are required too. As you can see the project is nothing different from a news web. We will use WordPress templates and then
customize. But there will be one additional interaction: Voting the choices each product will offer. The choice having more votes, the «leading choice» (as we will see in each product) must be highlighted and be at first sight in a «leadership banner» with no figures. To see the figures, you must click to see the full displayed product.

Haters not allowed. Your advice is required on this issue. NYT comment bar with flags can be good option.

If we are missing something, your alert is paramount. For instance, how the product will look like once tweeted?



Product ONE. Placed in the respective country edition, it must indicate:

1. Name of Product ONE —it will be 3 types of Product ONE with different names— section,
location (country or city) and topic. If it becomes trending, it must be shown as such besides sections.
2. Headline and subhead from 3 to 5 primary contents —or «PCs»— which will be links or documents
with its own name. Product ONEs headline in different colour from the PCs names for distinguishing.
3. The source its date its time of each PC and its visibility with an icon displaying info: H (high) M (medium) L (low) and N/A (Non-applicable).
4. Voting process with a banner for each PC to be voted for hours defined. Intuitivity is paramount.
5. A text of the Editor User justifying its vote for one of the PCs. It can be also expressed in video.
6. A sidebar like nytimes.com for written and/or audio comments.
7. A leadership banner reflecting the PC obtaining more votes for example «x leads in beauty».
8. The percentage of the total vote worth the authors vote.
9. The PC obtaining more votes must be highlighted in the leadership banner and: A) Be at first sight. B) The rest of the PCs must be shown decreasingly from the most to the lesser voted.
10. Most voted choice can be rotating.

Product ONE Displayed.

Product ONE Non-displayed. It shows until Editor and interactions icons and the subhead “Go deeper” Figures of why “x is leading in beauty” will be shown only when clicked and displayed.

Small Non-displayed

Product TWO. Placed in the respective country edition, it must indicate:

1. Name of Product TWO, section, location (country or city) and topic. If the topic becomes trending, it must be shown as such besides sections.
2. Headline and subhead 1 PC —link or document—with its own name. Perhaps Product TWOs headline in different colour from the PC name for distinguishing them.
3. The source of the PC its day its time, and visibility with a small icon H (high) M (medium) L (low)
and NA (non-applicable).
4. Voting process. Voting banner for two options: The option of the author expressed in his Product Two
and the option of the PC; for hours defined. Intuitivity here is paramount.
5. A text of the Editor User justifying its vote for its Product TWO. Can also add video with it instead.
6. A sidebar like nytimes.com for written and/or audio comments to the opinion.
7. A leadership banner reflecting the choice obtaining more votes «x leads in beauty»
8. The percentage of the total vote worth the authors vote.
9. The option obtaining more votes must be highlighted in the leadership banner and: A) Be at first sight
B) The other option must be shown as lesser voted.
10. Most voted choice can be rotating.

Product TWO Displayed

Product TWO Non-Displayed. It shows until Editor and icons to interact and the subhead “Go deeper” Figures of why “x is leading in beauty” will be shown only when clicked and displayed.

Go deeper (1 min. read) Go deeper (1 mi n. read)
Smaller Non-display.



Product THREE. Placed in the respective country edition, it must indicate:

1. Name of Product THREE, section, location (country or city) and topic. If the topic becomes trending, it must be shown as such besides sections.
2. Headline and subhead of Product THREE and only one option to vote. Thus, users vote or not.
Intuitivity here is paramount.
3. A text of the author justifying its vote for Product THREE. Can choose to add video with it.
4. Kind of map showing the universe of votes and the votes issued. We need the information where the vote were issued.
5. A sidebar like nytimes.com for written and/or audio comments to the opinion. As showed in Products
ONE and TWO
6. A leadership banner reflecting how many votes the choice is obtaining
7. The voting option must be highlighted with the number of votes obtained in the leadership banner and be at first sight.

Product THREE Displayed


Product THREE Non-Displayed. It shows until Editor and icons to interact and the subhead “Go deeper” How many votes the choice is obtaining will be shown only when clicked and displayed.


Smaller Non-display.

Go deeper (1 min. read) Go deeper (1 min. read)


Product FOUR. Placed in the respective country edition, it must indicate:

1. Name of Product FOUR, section, location (country or city) and topic. If the topic becomes trending, it must be shown as such besides sections.
2. Headline and subhead of Product FOUR from 2 to 4 PCs —links with its own name—. Perhaps
Product FOUR s headline in different colour from the PCs names for distinguishing.
3. The source its date its time of each PC
4. Voting process of only two options defined by the editor for hours defined. Intuitivity is paramount.
5. A text or column of the author justifying its vote for one option. an option to place a video with
his opinion.
6. A sidebar like nytimes.com for written and/or audio comments. As shown in Product ONE
7. A leadership banner reflecting the position obtaining more votes for example «x leads in beauty».
8. The percentage of the total vote worth the authors vote.
9. The option obtaining more votes must be highlighted in the leadership banner and: A) Be at first sight
B) The other option must be shown as lesser voted.
10. Most voted choice can be rotating.

Product FOUR Displayed.

Product FOUR Non-Displayed. It shows until Editor and icons to interact and subhead
“Go deeper” How many votes the leading will be shown only when clicked and displayed.

Go deeper (1 min. read) Go deeper (1 mi n. read )


The Archive. The user can fill up the archive without creating Products. Something autonomous.

As the PC can be deleted the user will have the option to place as a backup a video of the PC (with its location date time) that will be in a YouTube account of ours.

If the user chooses to backup he or she must search for the person or entity related to the PC in the search engine. It can be created or not.

If it is no created user must fulfil

Name of person or entity related: Felipe Miranda
Place its Wikipedia link. It will show up partially.


Name of the source of the PC PC link (must be placed)
PC name or headline
PC Topic
Date:
Place YouTube video link as a backup. Add.
Again, with each PC of Product FOUR

Vote your perception regarding the person or entity created.

Profiles of the archive can be shared for voting the perception.

If Felipe Miranda is created the search engine will show it

Felipe Miranda

And his contents related.

The users can add contents completing

Source of the PC PC link
PC name or headline
PC Topic
Date
Place YouTube video link as a backup. Add.
Vote your perception.

Metrics. The metrics must address the following data exportable to an infographic for internal use in a defined period of time.

Number of total users
Number of active users. Those who make conversions and interact. Number of conversions, clicks on headlines to see full displayed Products Remaining time of user at the web
Number of votes Number of comments Number of shares
Repetition of conversions and interactions.

BackOffice



Internal number of the application

Editor noticed in charge

Date/time of the application
User applying contact details profile


Preview link Publication Authorized Date and time

Publication
Denied
Date and time

Master Editor Decision (Optional) Date and time



Editor 1

1
Name Telephone e-mail Country City Profession
Link
displaying the preview of
the applied content
Ex post changing editors decision

Editor 2

When a content is applied, Editor 1
receive an internal notice for being in charge. The next applications must notice to Editor 2. The next must notice to Editor 1,
and so on, as a rotative work.
The number of editors could increase
Prevail over editors decision
And it is published.
When you place the cursor over the link a window with the Product must display to check

Misbehavior flags


Editor in charge

Comment flagged

Link
User
flagged data profile

Name Telephone e-mail Country City
See all flags over the comment and why


Information displayed in a window
See all flags over the user



Information displayed in a window
Delete flagged comment
Mute the user
Block the user
Delete the user
Flag dismissed
displaying it
Link displaying profile
Day time Until Until








Editor in charge must be the same who authorized the content.

Presupuesto:

750 euros

Fecha de la petición:

13 de Julio 2021

¿Interesado en enviar tu presupuesto Web?

Por 5 euros al día, hoy puedes enviar este y 154 presupuestos más, ¡Aprovecha!

¡Envía tu presupuesto!

¿Qué dicen nuestros Wexpertos?

Tras anunciarnos en otras páginas sin éxito, probamos Wexpertos y estamos encantados. ¡Un único pago anual que recuperamos con el primer cliente! ¡La primera semana!

Fco Javier Celdrán Desarrollador Web

Os doy las gracias y enhorabuena por llevar a cabo de forma tan profesional y seria Wexpertos. En los primeros días que llevo suscrito ya estoy haciendo una web que ha venido por vosotros. ¡Gracias de nuevo y adelante!

Manel Caparrós Desarrollador Web

¡Más Leads de los que podemos atender, una locura! Todo ello, sin tener que pagar las abusivas comisiones que se manejan hoy día por prospección y afiliados. ¡Bravo Wexpertos!

Carlos García Programador Web

Gracias a Wexpertos nos llegan nuevos prospectos de calidad cada día. Hay una amplia bolsa de proyectos que poder escoger por 5 euros al día, por lo que nosotros ya hemos dicho “adiós” a otras campañas de publicidad.

Marta Torres Consultora Web

Wexpertos se ha convertido en mi única entrada de posibles clientes, por lo que me ahorro los costes de publicidad.

Rubén Mir Diseñador Web

Este sitio web utiliza cookies propias y de terceros de análisis para recopilar información con el fin de mejorar nuestros servicios, así como para el análisis de su navegación. Si continúa navegando, supone la aceptación de la instalación de las mismas. El usuario tiene la posibilidad de configurar su navegador pudiendo, si así lo desea, impedir que sean instaladas en su disco duro, aunque deberá tener en cuenta que esta acción podrá ocasionar dificultades de navegación de la página web.

Más información